Courts and Democracies in Asia

What is the relationship between the strength of a countrys democracy and the ability of its courts to address deficiencies in the electoral process? Drawing a distinction between democracies that can be characterised as dominant-party (for example Singapore, Malaysia, and Hong Kong), dynamic (for example India, South Korea, and Taiwan), and fragile (for example Thailand, Pakistan ,and Bangladesh), this book explores how democracy sustains and is sustained by the exercise of judicial power. In dominant-party systems, courts can only pursue dialogic pathways to constrain the governments authoritarian tendencies. On the other hand, in dynamic democracies, courts can more successfully innovate and make systemic changes to the electoral system. Finally, in fragile democracies, where a country regularly oscillates between martial law and civilian rule, their courts tend to consistently overreach, and this often facilitates or precipitates a hostile take-over by the armed forces, and lead to the demise of the rule of law.