International Law Reports

Decisions of international courts and arbitrators, as well as judgements of national courts, are fundamental elements of modern public international law. International Law Reports is the only publication in the world wholly devoted to the regular and systematic reporting in English of such decisions. It is an absolutely essential work of reference. The series, established 60 years ago (originally under the title of Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases), covers the years from 1919. Four volumes a year, each of some 700 pages, is envisaged. The cases are drawn from every relevant jurisdiction - international and national. The series is, therefore, the most convenient source of case law material in the field. The volumes are prepared by an experienced team under the auspices of the Research Centre for International Law in the University of Cambridge. All decisions in foreign languages are translated into English. By reason of its standing and scope of coverage, the series is widely and regularly cited in judgements of international and national tribunals, as well as in the literature of the subject. There is no question here of choosing between this series and some other. There is no other publication that even remotely provides a comparable coverage of case law in this field. The series is a must for every library that needs to provide even minimal international law coverage. It is also the most economical and efficient way of accessing the whole range of international case law material.

Spis treści:
Table of Cases Reported
I. Decisions of International Tribunals
Court of Justice of the European Communities
French Republic v. Commission of the European Communities (Case C327/91) (1994), SAT Fluggesellschaft mbH v. European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Case C364/92) (1994), European Court of Human Rights
Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann Case (1989), Autronic AG Case (1990), Groppera Radio AG and Others Case (1990), International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
In the Matter of Tradic (Application for a Formal Request for Deferral) (1994), II. Decision of Municipal Courts
Chiou Yaou Fa v. Morris [Australia] (1987), Schoenmakers v. Director of Public Prosecutions [Australia] (1991), Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trde and Others v. Magno and Another [Australia] (1992), Reid v. Republic of Nauru [Australia] (1992), R v. Donyadideh and Others [Australia] (1993), Regina v. Salvador, Wannamaker, Campbell and Nunes [Canada] (1981), Regina v. MacDonald [Canada] (1982), Re Mitchell and The Queen [Canada] (1983), Re Regina and Palacios [Canada] (1984), Aziz v. Caruzzi [Italy] (1983), Labyad v. Ilari [Italy] (1983), Food and Agricultural Organisation v. INPDAI [Italy] (1983), Re Almirante and Cecovini (Case No 300/84) [Italy] (1984), Church v. Ferraino and Others (Case No 283) [Italy] (1986), Consul-General of Belgium in Naples v. Esposito (Case No 666) [Italy] (1986), Largueche v. Tancredi Fenu (Case No 9321) [Italy] (1987), Panattoni v. Federal Republic of Germany (Case No 6172) [Italy] (1987), British Consulate-General in Naples v. Toglia (Case No 2329) [Italy] (1989), Condor and Filvem v. Minister of Justice (Case No 329) [Italy] (1992), MvdV v. Minister of Foreign Affairs [The Netherlands] (1983), Compania Naviera Panlieve SA v. Public Prosecutor [The Netherlands] (1984), PMJ v. Public Prosecutor [The Netherlands] (1985), Compania Naviera Panlieve SA v. Public Prosecutor [The Netherlands] (1984), PMJ v. Public Prosecutor [The Netherlands] (1986), FdCS v. Minister for Foreign Affairs [The Netherlands] (1986), Netherlands v. Bergings en transportbeddrijf Van den Akker and Another [The Netherlands] (1986), JK v. Public Prosecutor [The Netherlands] (1987), Menten v. Federal Republic of Germany [The Netherlands] (1987), Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Another v. Public Prosecutor and Another [The Netherlands] (1988), Muiden Chemie BV v. State Secretary for Economic Affairs [The Netherlands] (1988), Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and another v. Vulcanus II Shipping Company and Another [The Netherlands] (1989), Tavita v. Minister of Immigration [New Zealand] (1993), Goldman v. Thai Airways International Ltd [England] (1983), Re Rafidain Bank [England] (1991), In re Pan American World Airways Inc and Others Application [England] (1992), In re Paramount airways Ltd (In Administration) [England] (1992), Du Pree and Others v. United States [United States] (1977), DeMauro Construction Corporation v. United States [United States] (1978), Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc v. Avagliano
Avagliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America Inc [United States] (1982), Collins and Others v. Weinberger and Others [United States] (1983), Canadian Overseas Ores Ltd v. Compania de acero del Pacifico [United States] (1984), Trans World Airlines, Inc v. Franklin Mint Corporation and Others
Franklin Mint Corporation and Others v. Trans World airlines, Inc [United States] (1984),Wickes v. Olympic Airways [United States] (1984), Gerritsen v. de la Madrid Hurtado and Others [United States] (1987), Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria and Others [United States] (1987), Kline and Others v. Kaneko and Others [United States] (1988), Lasidi SA and Others v. Financiera Svenida SA and Others [United States] (1989), Liu v. Republic of China [United States] (1989), Rush-Presbyterian-St. Lukes Medical Center and Others v. Hellenic Re